#Inspector parker online game trial

He said there was a “substantial” factual dispute – concerning what outcome had been predetermined by Camelot’s computer system – between Mrs Parker-Grennan and Camelot, which a judge could not resolve summarily.īarrister James Couser, representing Mrs Parker-Grennan, said there was “no real prospect of the claim being successfully defended”. “It is inappropriate for (the) claim to be determined summarily.” “There is, at the lowest, a real prospect of Camelot successfully defending (Mrs Parker-Grennan’s) claim at trial,” he said in a written argument. The dispute between the parties is actually quite a narrow one James Couser Lawyers representing the operator say there is a “real prospect” of Camelot winning at a trial, and Mrs Parker-Grennan’s application should be dismissed.īarrister Philip Hinks, who led Camelot’s legal team, argued that the operator was only liable to pay the “outcome of the ticket as predetermined” by Camelot’s computer system. Mrs Parker-Grennan, who was not at the High Court hearing, says there should be summary judgment in her favour because Camelot cannot win at a trial. They said the premise of the game was that if a number in the “your numbers” section of the screen matched one in the winning numbers section, the two matching numbers would turn white, indicating that the player had won the prize “designated by those matching numbers”.

#Inspector parker online game trial

There is, at the lowest, a real prospect of Camelot successfully defending (Mrs Parker-Grennan’s) claim at trial Philip Hinks

Lawyers told the judge that Mrs Parker-Grennan, from Boston, Lincolnshire, had played online after buying an Instant Win Game ticket for £5 on August 25 2015.

The judge described the case as “interesting” and said he aimed to deliver a ruling in the near future. Mr Justice Jay on Wednesday finished overseeing the latest stage of the dispute at a High Court hearing in London. Joan Parker-Grennan has sued Camelot, saying the National Lottery operator is “bound” to pay her a £1 million prize.Ĭamelot disputes her claim and says it is only liable to pay £10.

A woman is embroiled in a High Court fight over whether she entitled to a National Lottery prize of £10 or £1 million is waiting for a judge’s ruling (Andrew Milligan/PA)Ī woman embroiled in a High Court fight over whether she is entitled to a National Lottery prize of £10 or £1 million is waiting for a judge’s ruling.